Categories
Divorce & Remarriage Family

European Court of Human Rights: Same-sex ‘marriage’ is not a human right

Unanimously, the World Court of Human Rights has established, verbatim, that “there is no right to homosexual marriage”, making it clear that homosexual partnerships do not, in fact, equal marriages between a man and a woman.  

STRASBOURG, France, June 29, 2016 (Godinterest) Unanimously, the World Court of Human Rights has established, verbatim, that “there is no right to homosexual marriage”, making it clear that homosexual partnerships do not, in fact, equal marriages between a man and a woman.  

The 47 judges of the 47 countries of the Council of Europe, which are members of the full Court of Strasbourg (the world’s most important human rights court), issued a statement of great relevance that has been surprisingly silenced by information progressivism and its area of influence.

In fact, unanimously, the 47 judges approved the ruling that “there is no right to homosexual marriage” as announced June 9 in the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, France, and closed out a discussion dating to 2004.

The court’s decision was in response to an unlawful same-sex “wedding” conducted June 5, 2004, by Noël Mamère, mayor of the French city Bègles and a member of the Green Party and  based on a myriad of philosophical and anthropological considerations based on natural order, common sense, scientific reports and, of course, positive law. Within the letter, in particular, the judgment was based on Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Mamère had advocated same-sex “marriage” since 2002 and chose to approve the 2004 “wedding” despite 4,000 letters sent to him. “I take the risk, I accept to be a provocateur,” Mamère said. The “marriage” was canceled shortly after and the mayor was suspended from office for one month.

This month, 12 years after the incident, the European Court has put an end to the matter with a ruling that is  equivalent to the articles of human rights treaties, as in the case of 17 of the Pact of San Jos and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. In this historic but not disclosed, Resolution, the Court decided that the concept of family not only contemplates “the traditional concept of marriage, that is, the union of a man and a woman”, but also that they should not be imposed on governments to “obligation to open marriage to persons of the same sex”.

As for the principle of non-discrimination, the Court also added that there is no discrimination, since “States are free to reserve marriage only to heterosexual couples.”

The decision of the European Court for Human Rights should bring to a halt pressure exerted by the ILGA and similar groups, especially in Eastern European countries, who fight for legislation that recognizes the uniqueness of a marriage between one man and one woman.

Leave your vote

627 Points
More

By Godinterest

Godinterest is dedicated to proclaiming Christ and set apart, to save and empower lives.

9 replies on “European Court of Human Rights: Same-sex ‘marriage’ is not a human right”

I’m not sure where you are getting your information, but good topic.
I needs to spend some time learning much more or understanding more.
Thanks for great information I was looking for this information for my mission.

Sweet blog! I found it while searching on Yahoo News.

Do you have any suggestions on how to get listed
in Yahoo News? I’ve been trying for a while but I never
seem to get there! Thank you

Individuals can place the bet on different online sites which
offers the facility. Also, because they are online, they
are able to offer other similar items like bingo, casino
games and poker to their current clients. The only advantage
is the fact that these bets are generally exciting making a whole
lot of games interesting.

This brings you to all the computer code for your website – if it is the first time
seeing these pages please do not go off. A positive sports perspective usually holds for
many adults, but also for a great many others, this perspective only
lasts “until” their particular child or team is involved.
Give them proofs that you’re an expert with your niche and you
are the best person to work with when they are wanting products or services that you just sell.

Many times the individual is likewise forced to carry
on a certain grade point average if they wish to keep your scholarship.
Three months later, it’s establishing again, which to me, is reasonable as the cause was not ever addressed, as much as I know.
So if managers do not take enough time to master the way to connect emotionally and personally using employees, to master their talents,
interests and values, then employees disconnect.

I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here.
The sketch is attractive, your authored material stylish. nonetheless, you command get got an impatience over that you wish be delivering the following.
unwell unquestionably come more formerly again as exactly
the same nearly very often inside case you shield this hike.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.